Perhaps not the conservative after all...

[Brwn_eyes0511]

Originally Posted by dissention

William Rehnquist had no judicial qualifications, either.

But he was "super geek" who was qualified to memorize obscure legal cases and compose opinions on such tedious things, which is required when you are a Supreme Court Justice. I don't think anyone wants a graduate from SMU on the Supreme Court.

Of course you do. The entire point of this thread that you started was to decry her nomination because you didn't think she was conservative enough. Don't bait and switch.

Yes, I DO want a right-wing conservative on USSC...but it wasn't the point of the argument. This thread was started based on the little known facts we have of this woman and where exactly she stands. You make your "stand" that she is a TRUE conservative based on what "Dobson knows and isn't saying" which is insane. So you are right, I do care, but it wasn't the point of the argument above.

I'm alarmed by any person Shrub tries to appoint to the United States Supreme Court, don't you worry about that.

Well, you aren't alarmed for the right reasons. You are alarmed because you are a staunch liberal who would bash anyone Bush would nominate, but more than likely praise anyone that a Democratic persident would have nominated. I think it is sad that there are those who rush to defend Bush under any circumstance, like this one. And it is also sad that there are those who rush out to defend any Democrat under any circumstance. This isn't a blue/red game...this is serious and it is the Supreme Court! Gee, why didn't Bush just nominate his dog "Barney"?