Atheist Tries to Behead Christian Neighbors - Page 2

ajmccarrell · #16 09-17-2008, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

Lolz.

Go read up on China and the Soviet Union you fools!

Pol Pot and Stalin both killed people to stop religion from spreading. They killed in the name of athiesm and if you believe the body count, they killed more people than any religious war ever did. This is documented historical fact people, again, very basic stuff; if you would take your heads out of your asses and listen to something besides party line.

ajmccarrell · #17 09-17-2008, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by estranged4life

guns don't kill people, Bullets do!

Ban the bullet and the gun is a useless prop.

Ah, I get it. So, if you can't defend your position, make jokes so you seem like you have a point.

BombaySapphire3 · #18 09-17-2008, 08:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajmccarrell

Pol Pot and Stalin both killed people to stop religion from spreading. They killed in the name of athiesm and if you believe the body count, they killed more people than any religious war ever did. This is documented historical fact people, again, very basic stuff; if you would take your heads out of your asses and listen to something besides party line.

I am certain that she understands those particular parts of history quite well and the Democratic "party line" does not deny any of it occured

.Do you really want to go down this road again?

ajmccarrell · #19 09-17-2008, 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

I am certain that she understands those particular parts of history quite well and the Democratic "party line" does not deny any of it occured

.Do you really want to go down this road again?

If she understood it, she wouldn't be making that point because it is obviously wrong, unless she is wrong on purpose. It's not a matter of opinion, it isn't even debatable. The democratic party line simply ignores the point and pretends it doesn't exist, rather then deny history. For those who follow the party line, it appears that history only begins the day you are born. Russian or European terrorists don't use religion, so the point is false on it's face. As Standy said, "Res ipsa loquitur".

GoldDustOrphan · #20 09-17-2008, 08:38 PM

I believe history begins at conception.

BombaySapphire3 · #21 09-17-2008, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajmccarrell

If she understood it, she wouldn't be making that point. The democratic party line simply ignores the point and pretends it doesn't exist, rather then deny history. For those who follow the party line, it appears that history only begins the day you are born.

Bud I'm really concerned you are cycling off of your meds again..that is one of the most preposterous things I have heard since Mooseilini last opened her trap!

strandinthewind · #22 09-17-2008, 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

. . . since Mooseilini last opened her trap!

she crossed her other leg while sitting?

ajmccarrell · #23 09-17-2008, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BombaySapphire3

Bud I'm really concerned you are cycling off of your meds again..that is one of the most presposterous things I have heard since Mooseilini last opened her trap!

Based on what? What makes it preposterous? Because you say so? LOL! Point to some source, or else you're talking out of your ass. Again, you make the argument about me instead of addressing what I said. You really are incapable of debating ideas. You'd much rather take unfounded cheap shots, but then again, I don't expect more out of you.

estranged4life · #24 09-17-2008, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajmccarrell

Ah, I get it. So, if you can't defend your position, make jokes so you seem like you have a point.

to defend my position to you, simple as that...and I dont align myself down party lines as you stated earlier (Though it appears you do - kind of hypocritical dontcha think?)

Seems like when the Liberals members here show their facts, you answer by rambling and rambling not really making a case point that is totally comprehensible nor do you back up you words.

Over the years as a member here, I watched many such as yourself get burnt over and over again with the same style of debating the Democrats here...

And it seems your getting toasted in the same manner - Open mouth, insert foot and enjoy sandwich!

And unlike SOME, I dont post egotistical stuff such as "The difference is that your ego has no accomplishments to back it up."

Brian "Here before you arrived, will still be here when you're gone" j.

BombaySapphire3 · #25 09-17-2008, 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ajmccarrell

Based on what? What makes it preposterous? Because you say so? LOL! Point to some source, or else you're talking out of your ass. Again, you make the argument about me instead of addressing what I said. You really are incapable of debating ideas. You'd much rather take unfounded cheap shots, but then again, I don't expect more out of you.

You made the preposterous statement so you need to prove it..the burden of proof is not mine I'm afraid.