Tom Hanks' hair

[irishgrl]

I loved the book and Ive read quite a few others that explore that whole premise further. Ive also read some of Dan Brown's other works and enjoyed them as well.

Personally I suspect there is something behind all the panning by the critics.
Especially when the book was on the best seller list for so long,

[Jyqm]

Originally Posted by cliffdweller

Tom Hanks's hair is not technically a mullet. A mullet is when one's hair is really short up front and on the sides and long in the back...think David Bowie's Ziggy Stardust red mullet circa 1972 and you've got it. 'Course, there are all kinds of variations and styles, but it's usually in that vein. And now that I've explained the finer points of what constitutes a mullet, I'm going to go brush and style mine

Do you know the German term for "mullet"? It's probably the best word in the entire language.

(By the way, anyone else oh so slightly annoyed by the inaccuracy of the title of this book/movie?)

[Red]

Originally Posted by cliffdweller

Tom Hanks's hair is not technically a mullet. A mullet is when one's hair is really short up front and on the sides and long in the back...think David Bowie's Ziggy Stardust red mullet circa 1972 and you've got it. 'Course, there are all kinds of variations and styles, but it's usually in that vein. And now that I've explained the finer points of what constitutes a mullet, I'm going to go brush and style mine

Tom Hanks has what we call "**** hair" and that is basically all it is. It looks like a bad piece per Richard's comment above.

I see you point, however the mullet has taken on many dubious forms in recent years. No, Tom Hanks' hair "style" isn't a traditional Kentucky Waterfall, yet there is a definite mullet tendancy. A little more stylized. Hence.......moo-lay. (bows with a flourish)