To Ghostracker - please use this thread - Page 3

Ghost_Tracker · #31 08-30-2005, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagringader&r

I don't think it was in bad taste to talk about Stevie's men and I think she would find it funny. BUT, for Ghost Tracker, here it is..when I first joined here, somebody warned me about the doubtful on this board. If you do actually know something:
1) You will be called a liar
2) Or delusional
3) Or a stalker
And if it what you know goes against popular belief or theories here, you'll be burned at the stake, lol. So, I'm not saying anybody in this thread is guilty of any of that (Lindsay is a friend of mine! Hi Lindsay!) but Ghost Tracker, it might be better to keep what you know to yourself. It isn't worth the headache. If you know something, be satisfied in knowing you know it. That's enough.

k - thanks!

sorry!

dissention · #32 08-30-2005, 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reebokandlace

Former Fan Mail Lady.

And crazier than a ****house rat.

lagringader&r · #33 08-30-2005, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SapphireSister

I'm not going to disucuss this anymore. From my understanding Stevie doesn't know what goes on here and doesn't WANT to know and the people around her do the best they can to make sure she doesn't. End of story.

Yep. If there's anything that would upset Stevie at all IF her peeps filled her in on what goes on here, it would be the *fat* comments, she can't sing, she doesn't move, she *shuffles*, blah, blah, blah. I think discussing her men would probably make her laugh. She'd be "oh you silly people, you don't know the HALF of it"!

lagringader&r · #34 08-30-2005, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReFleetwoodMac

Well if I told you, you would immediately drop Mr. Dr. and run screaming into Chad's arms. I'm not sure if you're ready for that just yet.

It's THAT big?!

Ghost_Tracker · #35 08-30-2005, 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kelly

Nickluvver, I am curious about something. Why not question posters who say that Stevie cares nothing about message boards?? Why only focus on one who says the content of some hurts her? I remember reading that someone had "heard" from a source they deem reliable that Stevie could care less about the internet...Ghostracker says he has "heard" that Stevie can be hurt by the content. Why zero in on him?

IMHO, there is no way in Hell Stevie is reading these messages boards. Whether she "hears" watered down versions of topics, on occassion, is unclear. I think Paula commented awhile back that it appeared that some of our comments and questions were being addressed by Stevie very quickly in interviews, etc. People started saying Waddy was cheating on his wife with Stevie and in the next few weeks she stressed at shows how she had "known him since 1971" and that she "views him as a brother". There were a few other things as well, like the Rhiannon movie. Maybe they were just coincidence. I dunno.

Yes - THANK you - BINGO!

sodascouts · #36 08-30-2005, 02:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David

I can only guess how others see it, but I use the Internet to entertain me. Pleasing or displeasing Stevie Nicks never was my concern, & it still isn't. I pay my monthly ISP bill, not Stevie, & will post my opinions as & where I wish. However, I also expect my own character & sense of decorum will keep me from flinging truly hateful garbage right & left on public forums about Stevie or any other innocent bystanders. That really doesn't get me off. The problem is that definitions of "hateful" or even "inappropriate" seem to vary from person to person.

Well said.

strandinthewind · #37 08-30-2005, 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagringader&r

I don't think it was in bad taste to talk about Stevie's men and I think she would find it funny. BUT, for Ghost Tracker, here it is..when I first joined here, somebody warned me about the doubtful on this board. If you do actually know something:
1) You will be called a liar
2) Or delusional
3) Or a stalker
And if it what you know goes against popular belief or theories here, you'll be burned at the stake, lol. So, I'm not saying anybody in this thread is guilty of any of that (Lindsay is a friend of mine! Hi Lindsay!) but Ghost Tracker, it might be better to keep what you know to yourself. It isn't worth the headache. If you know something, be satisfied in knowing you know it. That's enough.

With all due respect, alot of the backlash comes in the presentation of the knowledge

Also, just saying you know something is cool, but people have a right to ask how. That is usually when the person with the knowledge gets all upset. It is sort of like a "how dare you question me" kind of thing. I also think that if people are really close to the band, they will say nothing as I am sure the band would want it that way. So, there are lots of factors at play in this. But, I agree, if you know something and do not want to be questioned on how you know it, it is better off not to say it.

lagringader&r · #38 08-30-2005, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ghost_Tracker

k - thanks!

sorry!

Oh ****, you don't have to apologize to me and I'm not calling you a liar at all. Just wanted to offer some advice somebody gave to me. I was new here not that long ago and I got raked over the coals and then toasted again for extra crispiness. Don't want to see you get in over your head or the same thing to happen to you. Like I said, if you know it, that's good enough. Just friendly advice.

lagringader&r · #39 08-30-2005, 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

With all due respect, alot of the backlash comes in the presentation of the knowledge

Also, just saying you know something is cool, but people have a right to ask how. That is usually when the person with the knowledge gets all upset. It is sort of like a "how dare you question me" kind of thing. I also think that if people are really close to the band, they will say nothing as I am sure the band would want it that way. So, there are lots of factors at play in this. But, I agree, if you know something and do not want to be questioned on how you know it, it is better off not to say it.

Yep, that's a good point. Gawd, I've racked up 10 posts on this thread alone!

strandinthewind · #40 08-30-2005, 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lagringader&r

. . . Gawd, I've racked up 10 posts on this thread alone!

that's because you are fabulous!!!!!

lagringader&r · #41 08-30-2005, 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReFleetwoodMac

Have you ever heard of outsourcing?

Do I want to know? Yep, I do. What the hell. Tell me.

lagringader&r · #42 08-30-2005, 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

that's because you are fabulous!!!!!

As are you. And for that? You deserve this:

Make that 12 posts..

lagringader&r · #43 08-30-2005, 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ReFleetwoodMac

I suggest you look it up in the privacy of someone else's home. I dare not discuss outsourcing in this setting.

I will relax in the comfort of someone else's home and look it up. Or I will stop everybody I see on the street and ask until I get a straight answer. Sounds wild! I learned about snowballing on the ledge, so why not this too?

Raeven Skye · #44 08-30-2005, 02:28 PM

wooo....outsourcing? snowballing? i must google this!

Sugar · #45 08-30-2005, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

With all due respect, alot of the backlash comes in the presentation of the knowledge

Also, just saying you know something is cool, but people have a right to ask how. That is usually when the person with the knowledge gets all upset. It is sort of like a "how dare you question me" kind of thing. I also think that if people are really close to the band, they will say nothing as I am sure the band would want it that way. So, there are lots of factors at play in this. But, I agree, if you know something and do not want to be questioned on how you know it, it is better off not to say it.

Agreed. Someone posted on one of the funeral threads not too long ago about some of the details of the service. I believe someone asked how she knew; she answered without going into a lot of detail, end of story. So while people surely tend to jump on those who claim to be close to the band, I don't think it's quite the snake pit that lagringader&r described.