Bush's Obscene Tirades Rattle White House Aides - Page 9

irishgrl · #**121** 08-27-2005, 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber

you don't? Really?

really. its a fact that the military accidentally hits non-military targets all the time. its regrettable, but it happens.

BTFLCHLD · #**122** 08-27-2005, 01:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber

oh. I don't get calling U.S. presidents "we". I thought you were talking about all of us here right now.

nope i dont think you all suck...wouldnt be here if i did...

well...maybe that is why im here...
cuz i know some of you suck
sometimes...
from what ive read...
oh for hell's sake...

SUCKME!

dissention · #**123** 08-27-2005, 01:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishgrl

I can tell you this much:
in law everything hinges on WHAT you knew and WHEN you knew it
That is why Bush is more culpable that Clinton.
sorry.

Again, why isn't Bush?

amber · #**124** 08-27-2005, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishgrl

really. its a fact that the military accidentally hits non-military targets all the time. its regrettable, but it happens.

it wasn't an accident. And even if it was, it should still bother you. Or at the very least you should understand why bombing would bother someone.

dissention · #**125** 08-27-2005, 01:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishgrl

really. its a fact that the military accidentally hits non-military targets all the time. its regrettable, but it happens.

They intentionally attacked it.

BTFLCHLD · #**126** 08-27-2005, 01:20 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

They intentionally attacked it.

take a bite out of me!

[edit:sorry out of context]
sos the ledge in desperate need of a perv thread a s a p

irishgrl · #**127** 08-27-2005, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux

No I think you've misinterpretted. I'm all too willing to announce my insanity, tendencies to dribble, stutter, scream and what have you. I giggle as they put me in the straight-jacket. However I'm referring to the fact that if I disagree with you my name will appear in your next 50 posts, accompanied by some reference to my lack of judgement, knowledge, sanity etc. And it is not just me but oh how you love it when it is me. Is it possible for you to create a sound argument and do so without excessive use of capital letters, usually emphasising how the other person is WRONG and you are RIGHT because the other person is PATHETIC? So yes I am insane, my you are observant, I try to keep a lid on it.

oh? keep up the GOOD WORK (note the CAPITAL LETTERS WHICH EMPHASIZE HOW YOU ARE WRONG AND I AM RIGHT BECAUSE YOU ARE PATHETIC..are you pathetic?)

You and I have found ourselves on opposite sides of many a debate Lux. I dont mind holding a different opinion. Isnt it funny that there's been no name calling from any other person Ive debated with except you. hmmmm

irishgrl · #**128** 08-27-2005, 01:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber

it wasn't an accident. And even if it was, it should still bother you. Or at the very least you should understand why bombing would bother someone.

Um did I EVER say I wasnt bothered by bombing? Did I EVER say Clinton wasnt bothered by what he did?

I personally dont condone bombing, but, sadly, the powers that be do NOT run their agenda past me. If they did, there'd be a much different tone in the world today...
as for Clinton, he has said that he regrets the loss of innocent life. Unfortunately, as President, there are decisions you make that you know will have consequences. the difference between Clinton and Bush is that Clinton was SORRY for what he did and Bush is still trying to justify it.

irishgrl · #**129** 08-27-2005, 01:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lux

Yes I found it hilarious too. I have seen the light (and also the dark) and know that to argue with someone who is always right or simply has blind devotion, is pointless. I also know that in the past you have enjoyed emphasising my stupidity so I've simply avoided the tiresome argument and gone straight for the fun part, emphasising your stupidity.

ah yes. tit for tat, so mature. 12 at least.

BTFLCHLD · #**130** 08-27-2005, 01:44 AM

yes an ageold argument...who is right and who is wrong...who feels sorry...who feels justified

amber · #**131** 08-27-2005, 01:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irishgrl

Um did I EVER say I wasnt bothered by bombing? Did I EVER say Clinton wasnt bothered by what he did?

I personally dont condone bombing, but, sadly, the powers that be do NOT run their agenda past me. If they did, there'd be a much different tone in the world today...
as for Clinton, he has said that he regrets the loss of innocent life. Unfortunately, as President, there are decisions you make that you know will have consequences. the difference between Clinton and Bush is that Clinton was SORRY for what he did and Bush is still trying to justify it.

You said this "As for the aspirin factory, Im not sure why that bothers you so.."
which was what I was commenting on. I guess I inferred that since you were not sure why the bombing would bother someone else, you were also not bothered by it. Which seems like a logical conclusion to me.

You're moving the argument around again. Your logic is strange. It doesn't matter that much that Clinton is sorry about it, and Bush is not.
Clinton still did those things. Those things are still done.
What is your purpose in comparing them? Are you trying to make Clinton appear "good" by telling us how much worse Bush is? That doesn't make what Clinton did any different.

It's like comparing dog **** to cat ****. They're both ****, and they both reek.
Just because cat **** smells worse, it doesn't mean that dog **** smells good.

BTFLCHLD · #**132** 08-27-2005, 01:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by amber

It's like comparing dog sh** to cat sh**. They're both sh**, and they both reek. Just because cat sh** smells worse, it doesn't mean that dog sh** smells good.

maybe strand could help us out on this?