Terri Schiavo: Please explain something to me... - Page 31

strandinthewind · #**451** 06-15-2005, 03:35 PM

Diss,

You are once again missing my point. I think that the poor should get all the help we can give. That is why I said no tax on the first $30,000 of income - which clearly addresses that problem

But, I fail to see how a 20% total cap on all taxes in any way hurts the poor, esp. if wasteful spending is stopped. So, stop talking about me saying the poor should not get help, etc., or that I differ with you on that point. I do not.

SuzeQuze · #**452** 06-15-2005, 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gldstwmn

They rigged it.

How the hell do they sleep at night?

strandinthewind · #**453** 06-15-2005, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

How the hell do they sleep at night?

In the White House and comfortably with a hole where their heart ought to be.

dissention · #**454** 06-15-2005, 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Diss,

You are once again missing my point. I think that the poor should get all the hlp we can give. That is why I said no tax on the firdst $30,000 of income. But, I fail to see how a 20% total cap on all taxes in any way hurts the poor, esp. if wasteful spending is stopped. So, stop talking about me saying the poor should not get help, etc., or that I differ with you on that point.

SO WHAT?

You willing to help pay for their healthcare? You willing to help them put food on the table for their kids? You willing to start calling for an end to these offensive welfare laws? Don't make them pay taxes, that sounds wonderful. But what about the other stuff? Raise taxes on the rich and start implementing more services for the poor with those funds.

dissention · #**455** 06-15-2005, 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

I love him too. My favorite socialist.

:weep: Seriously, doesn't this just seem logical? It always has to me.

It seems to logical to a lot of people, but when the rich run the country, logic doesn't matter.

strandinthewind · #**456** 06-15-2005, 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

SO WHAT?

You willing to help pay for their healthcare? You willing to help them put food on the table for their kids? You willing to start calling for an end to these offensive welfare laws? Don't make them pay taxes, that sounds wonderful. But what about the other stuff? Raise taxes on the rich and start implementing more services for the poor with those funds.

I do not think it requires raising taxes and am a little taken aback that you automatically assume it does. Have you ever looked into wasteful govt. spending. I have and it sickens me to know that all of the money we all give essentially goes to promote that. So, I say stop that first and we'll see how much money the govt. really needs to help everyone. But, to make anyone pay 70% of what they make is insane, which is not the same as saying the poor do not deserve every beak they can get.

dissention · #**457** 06-15-2005, 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

I do not think it requires raising taxes and am a little taken aback that you automatically assume it does. Have you ever looked into wasteful govt. spending. I have and it sickens me to know that all of the money we all give essentially goes to promote that. So, I say stop that first and we'll see how much money the govt. really needs to help everyone. But, to make anyone pay 70% of what they make is insane, which is not the same as saying the poor do not deserve every beak they can get.

Ha. The day we eliminate wasteful government spending is the day monkeys fly out of my arse and fly me to Oz.

And I have not argued that anyone should pay 70% in taxes, that's absurd.

SuzeQuze · #**458** 06-15-2005, 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

Especially since so many of the rich are the ones making their money off of the very people who have nothing. These people don't have a pot to piss in or a window to throw it out of, yet taxing the rich a bit more to give the poor a somewhat better life is called "unfair"? What do you call the impoverished lives these people lead? Fair?

That's what I hate the most. The fat cats living off the backs of the little guys. Getting millions of dollars a year while the little guy has no health insurance and in all likelihood works harder (e.g. Walmart).

It seems that people in senior management of corporations do not feel that they need to try to take care of the people that keep them flush.

strandinthewind · #**459** 06-15-2005, 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

Ha. The day we eliminate wasteful government spending is the day monkeys fly out of my arse and fly me to Oz..

Then making anyone pay more taxes to support this is insane and does nothing but waste the higher taxes you support

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

And I have not argued that anyone should pay 70% in taxes, that's absurd.

I think you did a long time ago, but for now, what is an adequate figure to rape the people making $200,000 and over with

On edit - I think I get 70% from your support of the death tax, which was at 70% I believe. I mean I can see 10 or 15% - but 70% - come on

SuzeQuze · #**460** 06-15-2005, 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

In the White House and comfortably with a hole where their heart ought to be.

Sons o...

SuzeQuze · #**461** 06-15-2005, 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

Ha. The day we eliminate wasteful government spending is the day monkeys fly out of my arse and fly me to Oz.

And I have not argued that anyone should pay 70% in taxes, that's absurd.

Because the people in charge do not police themselves. But if a light were shone brightly on this then maybe we could force change. Embarrass them into reforming their rediculous spending.

strandinthewind · #**462** 06-15-2005, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

Because the people in charge do not police themselves. But if a light were shone brightly on this then maybe we could force change. Embarrass them into reforming their rediculous spending.

And the current administration is the worse ever - and that is saying a lot

SuzeQuze · #**463** 06-15-2005, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

And the current administration is the worse ever - and that is saying a lot

The revolution will not be televised, it's on the radio. By the way, have you checked out Ed Schultz show? I think you would enjoy it because he is liberal but he is also fair and doesn't like to call people names or say things that other lefty talk show hosts will say. I like him, but I like the others as well. http://www.wegoted.com/ He used to be an R and more righty but has changed his ways.

strandinthewind · #**464** 06-15-2005, 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SuzeQuze

The revolution will not be televised, it's on the radio. By the way, have you checked out Ed Schultz show? I think you would enjoy it because he is liberal but he is also fair and doesn't like to call people names or say things that other lefty talk show hosts will say. I like him, but I like the others as well. http://www.wegoted.com/ He used to be an R and more righty but has changed his ways.

I will check him out!!!!!!!!!

SuzeQuze · #**465** 06-15-2005, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

I will check him out!!!!!!!!!

You can stream him right now and he is talking about this!!! Just go to that link. You will love him. His words often remind me of something you would say.