|
|
#76
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Chris
__________________
CHRIS M. |
|
#77
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
![]() But, they have to promote it for it to sell at all. |
|
#78
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
That's why I always think all this stuff about promotion is moot. Most of these Stevie & Fleetwood Mac releases are promoted: they show up on talk shows, give interviews, make videos, etc., but none of that activity is worth much. You know, people tune in to their morning news shows & watch Fleetwood Mac shiver their bums off in Manhattan while they play four or five songs, but the viewers don't jump online at Amazon just because Fleetwood Mac is on their boob tube. I don't think older, widely known bands like Fleetwood Mac need promotion anyway; I think they all have their fan base, & those are the album sales. Stevie Nicks has about a million people in the United States who think of themselves as big fans of hers & who buy her stuff as well as the Fleetwood Mac stuff. That seems to me a pretty good explanation for why Shangri-La sold about what Say You Will did. They both sold about a million, or not quite a million. The four million behind "The Dance" must have been just a bandwagon that all the yups jumped on -- all the fans of Dave what's-his-name who was so big in the late '90s & other acts who were adult-contemporary & who generated a big block of buyers for that sort of fare. "The Dance" is history; those buyers have long since moved on -- to what, I don't know, because I don't listen to commercial radio. But it's the Stevie Nicks fans who bought Shangri-La & Say You Will. The rest of the world really isn't interested (although, paradoxically, they're still interested in going to a Fleetwood Mac rock concert, but that's just a fun night out with wife & beer, & doesn't signify anything else). So that's why I think promotion is moot. If you're 25 & breaking, it's important. But if you're 55 & just a back-catalog artist with an aging fan base, why do you need it -- especially when radio doesn't want your new stuff? All you need is a label that leaves you alone, for the most part, & lets you take whatever chances you want to take.
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com Last edited by David; 03-12-2005 at 12:08 PM.. Reason: Dave Matthews is whom I'm thinking of. |
|
#79
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Stevie's never going to cater to what's hip, she doesn't have it in her. The record-buying public loves to give classic artists comebacks, but after the one comeback is given to them, everyhting after it just falls by the wayside. Stevie had hers with The Dance. Cher had hers with Believe. Blondie had theirs with No Exit. The Eagles had theirs with Hell Freezes Over. You only get one shot, traditionally.
__________________
![]() Last edited by dissention; 03-12-2005 at 12:12 PM.. |
|
#80
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
) - Everyday, POTU, and Sorcerer initially got plenty of airplay in Atlanta which is a major market. Interestingly, so did "If You Ever Did Believe." They also got airtime in my smallish hometown in Louisiana and I remember hearing them on the radio in New Yor City. I think the songs were good and the exposure was there but they just did not catch on - sadly so IMO. |
|
#81
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
The sales of "Believe" weren't a response to the promotion (I don't even remember seeing Cher around at that time) but to hearing the song over & over again on the radio. The only Fleetwood Mac songs you hear that frequently are the back-catalog tracks -- that's undoubtedly what keeps people at their shows.
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com |
|
#82
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Cher was a little bit of pioneer there IMO. I think La Nicks could hit big with a ballad a la Landslide. That is what people want to see her do IMO. |
|
#83
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think EFO was a try to 'cater what's hip'. It's very similar to Believe.
__________________
Curtis |
|
#84
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
#85
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#86
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#87
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|
#88
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
"Catching on" is exactly what happens when you get a big hit on the radio. New Stevie & new Fleetwood doesn't do that ... not even in Atlanta. ![]()
__________________
moviekinks.blogspot.com |
|
#89
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I think EFO had great potential. However, her vocals should have been more intense and on target and it should have been a Stevie Nicks song and not a Fleetwood Mac song. It would have been a great first single out of the gate. ![]()
__________________
Curtis |
|
#90
|
||||
|
||||
|
I was responding to the comment that Stevie needs to get on the radio by saying those songs got airplay when they came out - they were given a chance to be hits - they were not wholly ignored by radio, etc. They did not, however, hit, with the exception of the dance remixes of POTU. So, I do not think getting on the radio is the problem. I think it is the lack on interest by the public, etc.
|
![]() |
|
|

Christine McVie 1984 LP Warner Bros 1-25059 Sterling Cut Fleetwood Mac Solo
$6.99
Christine McVie of Fleetwood Mac on 7/19/78 in East Troy Wi Old Photo
$6.96
Christine McVie 2 CD Lot: In The Meantime + Lindsey Buckingham
$12.00
christine mcvie hand signed 1970s excellent Fleetwood Mac – Mystery To Me lp33
$284.29
CHRISTINE McVIE "LOVE WILL SHOW US HOW" Sheet Music P/V/G 1984 Unused
$18.00