Bangs or no bangs????? That is the question!!!!

diamondsnake · #1 08-08-2004, 01:07 AM

As far as Stevie's hairstyles on this tour go (the 2003 dates without bangs and the the 2004 summer dates with bangs) which did you like more?

I am going to say without bangs! I think she looks so much younger without them. I have seen some really awful (sorry) pictures of Stevie now that she has the bangs and earlier in the tour when she didn't have the bangs she seemed a lot more photo friendly! I wonder what her hair will be like after the two month break at the Atlantic City show!

xdreamsunwindx · #2 08-08-2004, 01:12 AM

Without the bangs. She looked much younger without them, in my opinion. She's gorgeous regardless what her hairstyle is, but the 2003 'do was much more flattering.

-Kate

blinker12 · #3 08-08-2004, 03:37 AM

No bangs.

Claripup · #4 08-08-2004, 04:41 AM

Hmmm.... Well flicking through my collection of Stevie pictures I'm hard pressed to find one of her without. So I guess I'd have to say with.... as the only pics I have of her without were taken during the "dodgy hairstyle" era.

GateandGarden · #5 08-08-2004, 09:35 AM

I was a bangs fan at first, but last time she ditched them and I saw some pics I really started to think she's better off without them. Needless to say, she blows me away regardless, but I do think she looks younger without them.

Hillary

Claudia · #6 08-08-2004, 10:08 AM

No bangs. They make her look older.

Vianna · #7 08-08-2004, 12:07 PM

She looks better without them.

GypsySorcerer · #8 08-08-2004, 12:22 PM

I loved her bangs during the TISL era. They haven't looked so good in 2004. I think she might look better with a lighter bang, not as thick and straight.

skcin · #9 08-08-2004, 12:43 PM

I guess I'm going to be the rebel here - I think that she looks younger with bangs. Not a huge fan of the no-bangs, parted almost in the middle 'do.

Paula

dissention · #10 08-08-2004, 02:09 PM

NO BANGS. She looks like she's trying to cover a brow lift when she has them.

On another note, she REALLY needs to thin out her hair, it's too thick and the color is too unnatural looking.

Johnny Stew · #11 08-08-2004, 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dissention

NO BANGS. She looks like she's trying to cover a brow lift when she has them.

If you're going to go through the hassle of having a brow lift, why bother covering your brow with bangs 98% of the time? That'd be like wearing muumuus after a tummy-tuck.

My preference is *with* bangs. Many of the photos of her on stage without bangs, made her face look tired and drawn. The bangs soften her face and take years off.

I'm glad she brought them back.

amber · #12 08-08-2004, 05:05 PM

Bangs, but well trimmed. Her face is very long, And bangs alleviates that. Member when she was younger, and those few pictures without bangs her head looked really weird?
AMber

dissention · #13 08-08-2004, 05:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Johnny Stew

If you're going to go through the hassle of having a brow lift, why bother covering your brow with bangs 98% of the time? That'd be like wearing muumuus after a tummy-tuck.

You have to conceal it while it heals, Le Stew.

I certainly wouldn't want to see Stevie with her hair parted in the middle, garnished by sutchers and stitches.

ontheEdgeof17 · #14 08-08-2004, 06:55 PM

No bangs.

I hate bangs that are cut straight across like that.

-Curt

GateandGarden · #15 08-08-2004, 07:18 PM

I'm not completely sold on the bangs, but I do think that Paula has a point, or maybe I just started to see the light when I was gazing at her avatar.

I might be in the minority, but I'm crazy about the way she looks in this photo--http://www.nicksfix.com/oct12z.jpg

Hillary