Sara question

[SmthngOfADreamr]

Originally posted by darklinensuit
I think Dreams live is pretty lame these days. Definitely no better than Gypsy, IMO.

- Jake

IMO Dreams is no where near as lame as Gypsy is live. Not even in the same league. Granted, it's not that exciting, but I still look forward to it a teeny tiny bit. Although I admit wouldn't be terribly sad if they replaced it with something newer/more rare.

[Sorcerer386]

I still don't understand why everyone thinks there some huge, elaborate story behind Stevie no longer doing Sara live. I still think it's the fact that Stevie got bored with doing it live. I mean, where has Beauty and the Beast been the past three solo tours? It's gone, because let's face it, by the time Timespace came around, she was obviously bored with it. And it's much harder to commit to doing a 7 to 8 minute song live that you find boring than to doing a 4 minute song that you might also find boring, but feel you should still perform it because the audience wants to hear it. Don't forget Stevie wanted Rhiannon out of the set for a while (at least that's what Mick's book said). I think Stevie still likes doing Rhiannon though, and she absolutely loves doing Gold Dust Woman and Landslide. However, I do admit that they should have pulled Sara out and did it this tour. But anyone who has performed, be it singing or dancing or acting, knows that doing something you find boring just isn't fun at all, so what's the point of performing if it's not fun for you?