The Ledge

Go Back   The Ledge > Main Forums > Rumours
User Name
Password
Register FAQ Members List Calendar


Make the Ads Go Away! Click here.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-21-2007, 01:35 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default Embarassing Grammy Performance

What are they talking about in this Bob Dylan article by Slate Magazine? I didn't think the 1997 performance was bad and I was glad they did Rhiannon instead of Dreams. Yes, I am sad it was just a nostalgic medley, but . . . I didn't think it was embarassing. I'm not saying the band has never embarassed me. I'm not sure what was going on with them on the Jay Leno show, for instance. They looked liked they'd never been on tv before, but I thought the Grammys went ok.

http://www.slate.com/id/1855/

Dylan got bad, but he never got stale. His constant reinvention and his constant touring saved him from rock geezerhood. If you go to a Rolling Stones or Eagles concert--and I strongly advise against it--three-quarters of the crowd will be paunchy baby boomers reliving their glory days. They'll sing along to 30-year-old songs performed exactly as they were 30 years ago. Were there any more embarrassing five minutes during the Grammies than Fleetwood Mac's performance? Bloated, sloppy, and greedy, the band regurgitated a medley of '70s hits to vast applause. But Dylan has been touring nonstop since 1988, winning over an entire generation of fans to his music (both new and old). America may be waxing nostalgic over Dylan, but there has never been a musician less concerned with nostalgia.
Reply With Quote
.
  #2  
Old 11-21-2007, 02:42 PM
mylittledemon's Avatar
mylittledemon mylittledemon is offline
Moderator
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Auckland, New Zealand
Posts: 8,512
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by michelej1 View Post
What are they talking about in this Bob Dylan article by Slate Magazine? I didn't think the 1997 performance was bad and I was glad they did Rhiannon instead of Dreams. Yes, I am sad it was just a nostalgic medley, but . . . I didn't think it was embarassing. I'm not saying the band has never embarassed me. I'm not sure what was going on with them on the Jay Leno show, for instance. They looked liked they'd never been on tv before, but I thought the Grammys went ok.

http://www.slate.com/id/1855/

Dylan got bad, but he never got stale. His constant reinvention and his constant touring saved him from rock geezerhood. If you go to a Rolling Stones or Eagles concert--and I strongly advise against it--three-quarters of the crowd will be paunchy baby boomers reliving their glory days. They'll sing along to 30-year-old songs performed exactly as they were 30 years ago. Were there any more embarrassing five minutes during the Grammies than Fleetwood Mac's performance? Bloated, sloppy, and greedy, the band regurgitated a medley of '70s hits to vast applause. But Dylan has been touring nonstop since 1988, winning over an entire generation of fans to his music (both new and old). America may be waxing nostalgic over Dylan, but there has never been a musician less concerned with nostalgia.
I remember watching that on TV. I thought Stevie sounded great...Lindsey sounded bad but his guitar was rockin...and Dont Stop sounded alright. They should've done "The Chain" or "Silver Springs" though...
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-21-2007, 03:41 PM
Villavic's Avatar
Villavic Villavic is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Lima Peru
Posts: 6,287
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by mylittledemon View Post
They should've done "The Chain" or "Silver Springs" though...

I agree.. I didn't find it embarrasing, but didn't like it anyway. It was like.. Ok, let's don't fight and the 3 of us will sing a part of its song.. or something like that, or just wanted to perform populars hits, I don't know.. The Chain would have resulted cooler.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-21-2007, 06:41 PM
michelej1 michelej1 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Posts: 26,025
Default

Well, I tend to hate a medley no matter what. If it sounds good it only leaves you wanting more and if it doesn't sound good, then what's the point? So, I didn't like that aspect of it, but I don't think they were bloated, dottering idiots or anything.

Michele
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-21-2007, 08:17 PM
danax6 danax6 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Stevie's nether land.
Posts: 4,839
Default

Stevie did complain about how tough it was to cram their stuff into a 5 minute performance, seeing the Grammy commity was so strict when it came to time. Not a second longer was allowed. Personally, I didn't like how rushed and amateurish it sounded. If they wanted to do a medley, they could have found a better way to blend the songs together.

But hey, any performance that has Lindsey wearing that sexy coat is fine.by.me.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-22-2007, 10:24 AM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

The med. was okay, but inappropriate IMO. I say SS was the hit of The Dance and it was a "new song." Therefore, they should have done SS. Interestingly, Landslide was in many ways a larger hit than SS in that it is still played way more on the radio to this day.

I think they are a band and they needed to act as such instead of placating the egos with the medley. I would even venture to go so far as to say CM and La Nicks would have played another's song and been happy with it. LB, I'm not so sure about.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On

Forum Jump


Fleetwood Mac – The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac 2 CD Set - NEW picture

Fleetwood Mac – The Very Best Of Fleetwood Mac 2 CD Set - NEW

$17.40



Fleetwood Mac LP Bundle - Best of Fleetwood Mac picture

Fleetwood Mac LP Bundle - Best of Fleetwood Mac

$124.99



*Near Mint* Fleetwood Mac Fleetwood Mac Epic BN 26402 XSB136926 picture

*Near Mint* Fleetwood Mac Fleetwood Mac Epic BN 26402 XSB136926

$75.00



Fleetwood Mac - Worldwide Live 10 CD Box Set - NEW picture

Fleetwood Mac - Worldwide Live 10 CD Box Set - NEW

$35.99



Fleetwood Mac - Alternate Collection (6 CD Box) New Sealed CD picture

Fleetwood Mac - Alternate Collection (6 CD Box) New Sealed CD

$45.99




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:51 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
© 1995-2003 Martin and Lisa Adelson, All Rights Reserved