Quote:
Originally posted by flyfirefly
No, it is bias. You implied in what I quoted, that the people at Mick's Chat are starting controversy, while the people here at the Ledge are simply asking questions. Please. Conveniently enough, you post here, and not Mick's Chat.
In my last post, no...that was you specifically, as you made the quote.
Typically, when I respond to a post someone above me has just posted and I'm not three or four posts down--and when I obviously replying to a comment they've made, you is appropriate as the you in question is the you who made the post.
And we're concerned with wording?
|
I think that it is all a bunch of horse ****, ok? and, hell yes, I am being controversial, and I am not sashaying around anything. I noted here that they insinuated that Louise may have doctored the posts from their guru. And, what is that to you? Why in the world are we even having this conversation? I don't care about wording, I care about intent. Call me out. I am totally over it all and have no problem saying what I think and I am gonna try to hold my line while being open to consider other views. ARe you taking this personally? What in the world is all this about? You go back and forth Fire...what do you want to accomplish? You know what I want to accomplish? I want JT to answer for what is questioned and to make amends and to be fired. THat is what I want. If, along the way, ppl want to defend him or his territory, then we may wrestle. You started a thread that was hijacked...happens all the time, but, hell, I didn't hijack it. I do not post there, and I could if I wanted to. I don't want to.
ANYWAY....Glitter,,,,How U Doin?
