View Single Post
  #146  
Old 05-27-2003, 04:53 AM
highpriestess53's Avatar
highpriestess53 highpriestess53 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: The Global Village
Posts: 337
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by glitter_fades

If they don't know the depth of the situation, they should. These people are not stupid. They're not children. They're not supposed to be on drugs anymore. They have no excuses...unless it's a calculated business decision NOT to know.

Again, the managers have all been given documentation about the situation. If her managment is contacted about something that could harm her public image, and they don't clue her in, they deserve to be fired, more so than the people she fired for forcing her into drug rehab. Where are the priorities?

The fact is that managers are there to handle their business affairs.....with regard to any controvercial info that may be given to the managers it is at the managers discretion that decide to pass on the info or not for the most part managers HANDLE EVERYTHING......IF it is going to damage their image that will not be down to the managers but down to the PR person to handle the fallout. The individual 'star' involved will be informed on a need to know basis until that time they pretty much live in ignorance. If they don't NEED to know then they won't be told.
If there is nothing to report that MANAGERS get paid to handle then they will not be told. That is what MANAGERS do they manage EVERYTHING.

I KNOW how difficult it was to get through to Stevie's management on a situation that she was personally involved with and all I needed to have was a yes or no answer....it took 5 MONTHS.....
__________________
highpriestess she's the keeper of the peace in this.......
I left for a while to do some other stuff; a University degree; bodybuilding; spray tanning the some of the best bodies on the planet....and now Fleetwood Mac is on our radars again.....
Reply With Quote