View Single Post
  #5  
Old 10-12-2010, 05:32 AM
paleshadow's Avatar
paleshadow paleshadow is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 1,436
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
Wow... you've chosen a tough topic. I am of the opinion that Fleetwood Mac is/was as non-spectacle as they come. Back in their heyday they weren't touring around with big screens, projectors, inflatable pigs, fog machines and lasers. The rhythm section (John, Mick, Christine) seemed to show up at gigs in their street clothes. Lindsey rocked the ki-mano and we all know about Stevie's penchant for Charles Dickens characters. But that's about it as far as costuming is concerned. They never had fancy lighting rigs or props or hydraulic thingamajigs operating hidden doors. The focus was always about the music and the dynamics of the band interactions.

Perhaps the focus should be more on the spectacle of the real-life drama between the band members than merely the visuals? It was almost like reality-theatre; there was always a tension and a degree of angst that I found most intriguing about The Five live- moreso than the color of Stevie's chiffon.
My thoughts exactly. It's hard to make the assignment work just to incorporate Fleetwood Mac because you love them. The only visual thing I remember in all these years as far as the stage setup was during the Behind the Mask Tour. They had this rig with images of masks on it that covered the stage and then rose as the band began to play. That was in 1990 though. Also, didn't they try to use a giant inflatable penguin during the Tusk tour? I think there are photos of that in My 25 Years in Fleetwood Mac?
__________________
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c62/dsaje/nicks.jpg
Reply With Quote