View Single Post
  #429  
Old 03-17-2010, 11:50 AM
LukeA LukeA is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,338
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by HejiraNYC View Post
...because the Eagles had already secured the stadiums on those dates, so one could safely assume that the shows would have proceeded with or without Fleetwood Mac on board. As it turns out, they are indeed proceeding without FM.
The dates may have been held, but "secured" (as in contracted)? As in, they *needed* to happen with or without Fleetwood Mac? Doubtful. They never needed Fleetwood Mac for anything.

My original point was- it might be nice to assume/believe that Fleetwood Mac turned down the tour (the "original plan"- as if the one article that was planted on an Azoff-controlled website could give us divine understanding into how these Eagles dates were planned) based on principle, as has been suggested.. but, in all likelihood, Eagles/Azoff simply realized could make more money with the announced dates/pairing.
Reply With Quote