View Single Post
  #27  
Old 03-04-2010, 02:34 AM
louielouie2000's Avatar
louielouie2000 louielouie2000 is offline
Addicted Ledgie
Supporting Ledgie
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 6,425
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carrie721 View Post
have you ever heard her sing live? or heard her play the piano? you can fault her for many things, but lack of musical and vocal acumen is not one of them.



just like everything that industry people say about stevie or any other artist is categorically true. come on! i don't know how she behaves when the cameras are off, but that's just a silly thing to say.

yes, i was talking about the arrogant comment. at this point in history, it's not a revolutionary thing to say, but there is truth to it. also, she's 23. you show me one young woman with aspirations to be anything but a housewife who hasn't felt that exact same way and i'll eat my yoga pants. in fact, she's not even denying that she's arrogant; she's just saying it's a less acceptable trait for women to have than men. again, true.

i would like to reiterate her age. 23. every young woman reaches a point in her life where she realizes that the bull**** bromides she was fed as a youngster (especially when it comes to the women of my generation, raised on a steady PC diet of "girls rock," "gender roles are societal constructs," etc) have not fully prepared her for the realities of adulthood. she is still cutting her teeth both as an adult and as an artist. i don't think what she said was that big of a deal.

furthermore, saying that women outsell men in the music biz hardly means they're calling the shots. entertainment is still largely a man's world, baby, and i say that as someone who hates gloria steinem. you won't find me spouting any feminazi dogma.

but to illustrate my point, on FLDS compounds, women and girls are a far more valuable commodity than boys, who are routinely dumped on the streets of salt lake city and reno. but does that mean the women are calling the shots? hardly. it may seem like a far-flung analogy, but in both cases we are talking about the economics of sex. prevalence and marketability do not necessarily add up to clout.
Why can't the fact I dislike Gaga be entirely separate from her gender? It wouldn't make a bit of difference to me if she were a man... in fact, I hate Adam Lambert for all the same reasons I detest Gaga. An attention grubbing spotlight hog is an attention grabbing spotlight hog, regardless of what's between their legs. I'm a gay man... I freaking love women. All my life my best friends have been women. I can hardly relate to men. The only advocacy/charity work I've ever associated myself with has been causes for equality when it comes to gender and sexuality. And by the virtue of being a gay man, all my gay friends AND my women friends have exposed me to Gaga and her studio AND live performances plenty. I just plain don't like her. Her flash to substance ratio is grossly off kilter. She's more concerned with saying, doing, and wearing things that will get her attention. What she wore to meet the Queen of England was completely insulting... and I don't even give two ****s about the monarchy! I was insulted that an AMERICAN representing our country and our entertainment biz looked like a damn fool in front of a world figurehead. And in turn, that makes Americans look disrespectful throughout the world. Yes, there is much work to be done when it comes to the equality of women in the world. I just don't see how Gaga wearing an outfit made entirely out of Kermit The Frogs is accomplishing good for humanity. If anything, people like Gaga are polarizing... further emboldening foes for inequality.

Last edited by louielouie2000; 03-04-2010 at 02:39 AM..
Reply With Quote