[fringed n fab]

Originally Posted by carrie721

but if "millions" of others have described it ... surely she had heard their descriptions before? and could possibly have just tailored her description of her experience to fit theirs?

also i have read that when people have near-death experiences, their brains are flooded with pain-numbing chemicals as a defense mechanism, and that those could have hallucinogenic properties, which would explain why so many people describe a bright light/tunnel type vision.

Theres always an explanation.


To the thousands of us collaborators on this particular book, and the many millions who don't question any more than we do that of course there's an afterlife, there are those who will always be ready with a list of handy explanations for what we "think" we're seeing, hearing, and feeling. "Grief hysteria," "oxygen deprivation," and variations on terms for both "mental illness" and "scam" are among the most popular. What these skeptics and "experts" are usually insisting on, though, is the same cynical demand, over and over and over again, which boils down to:

"Prove that there's life after death."

I'm sixty-six years old, and I've never spent one instant doubting that there's life after death. The thousands of us who contributed to this book, on earth and beyond it, don't doubt it. The millions we represent don't doubt it. God certainly doesn't doubt it, since He's the One who told us it's true in the first place, and we take His word for everything. We're not the ones who are having a problem with this. You are. So why do we keep knocking ourselves out trying to prove something we already know with absolute certainty?

Here's my suggestion to the skeptics and "experts," for a refreshing change of pace. We're done proving that there's life after death. We've proven it well past our own satisfaction. From now on, let's do it this way: You prove that there's not.