Quote:
Originally Posted by markolas
While I think all of them should die in prison, no matter what illness they might come down with, Goddess6's post above is a little over-the-top. I don't think I could ever bring myself to laugh at the fact that someone has brain cancer, no matter who it was. Susan Atkins was 21 when she committed those murders - at 61, she has spent nearly her entire life in prison (and rightfully so). She does appear to have remorse for what she did, and seems to understand that she made her own bed.
I also don't think it should matter that Sharon Tate was beautiful. I mean what about the fat, nerdy teenager they shot to death before they went into the Tate house?
|
susan laffed while butchering these people & bragged about it~ she only showed a bit of remorse as of late, because she herself is suffering~ the only perp in this whole crime that i believe shows remorse in leslie van houten~ & should she be out?, well even tho i think she of all of them have the best chance of parole, she should serve her time too~
& yes i do remember steven parent also, the one you call that fat nerdy teenager~ i just brought up sharon because just like stevie, i have been a fan of hers for many, many years~ so i apologize for you feeling i left the other victims out of this, i haven't~ & i am sorry you think i am being harsh~ but susan got life w/out parole & she should serve it for what she did~ along w/ the rest of them~ it's not like she commited a traffic infraction, or these killings were an "accident", it was a butcher, plain & simple~ & as many others i have seen the crime scene photos, the real ones, not the ones doctored up where the bodies are whited out~ so, is susan getting her just desserts?, hmmmmm as for me, i can sleep just fine at night knowing that she's not going anywhere~ i'm sure all of the victims, would have wanted some "compassion" when it came to how they died too, but susan & the rest of "the family" made sure that wouldn't happen~
Steven Parent
