View Single Post
  #3  
Old 06-04-2009, 10:58 PM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jwd View Post
. . .Seems like it cuts both ways Jason. I believe there are moderates in both parties. I do hope that the gay rights issues can be advanced by our government in the near future.
Although those D's declined to give their view - Touche' -- however, what I meant was that the R's seemingly could get a unanimous vote against any advancement of gay rights issue. Conversely, the D's likely would get a solid majority or more on an issue advancing gay rights - or, even more if push came to shove. Remember, the far religious right is the base of the R party and they want gay people in jail (see Lawrence v. Texas) - much less their unions or them recognized in any way by the govt.

To me, it is a no brainer - give the gays their rights and move on - I think like in Mass., Vt, and other places, once it is in place, no one really gives a shiitte. But, there is money to be made on both sides - Prop 8 alone generated hundreds of millions in revenue on both sides when you count the peripheral stuff. I mean look at Perez Hilton. While he likely believes in this cause, his site and ergo income sure benefited from the controversy he alone created.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world

Last edited by strandinthewind; 06-04-2009 at 11:01 PM..
Reply With Quote