Quote:
Originally Posted by Test4echo
Rush boring? Your not serious. You can't be.
Don't make me fight you......lmao.
yea, Rush is a VERY acquired taste. They just appeal to me and unlike you I LOVE how they can play the way they do. I appreciate how well they can translate a "What you hear on the record" is pretty much what they do Live."
But honestly I wouldn't want to hear Fleetwood Mac like that.
I appreciate how Fleetwood Mac changes up the arraignments for their live performances.
The Dance arraignment wise is much better than the recorded versions to me.
test,
|
Rush are one of the bands that are on my "See live before they die" list. I'm a massive fan and own all their concert DVDs (and CDs, of course), but if you have one Rush concert DVD then you don't need any of the others unless you want a few different songs because every version of every song is more less identical.
I've listened to most of the Pittsburgh show and there are a few musical fluffs but I don't hear anything too major. I thought they did a great job. Care to point some out to me? I've not been listen as a "musician" but I'll go back to it with my technical ears on next time.
And as boring as Mick's solo is at this point it wasn't bad as Peart's from the Snakes and Arrows DVD. That solo made me sad because it was actually the part of the DVD I was most looking forward to and it ended up being technical but unlistenable.
