Quote:
Originally Posted by ajmccarrell
I guess Reverend Wright and Father Flueger ought to know all about preaching hate, Obama attends their churches and their pews certainly are full. In the 20 or so years I went to church, I NEVER heard any minister hate anyone or call anyone a "fag" or anything else like that. The only place I've heard "fag" from in the last year, is YOU. All I heard was the cloying phrase, "hate the sin, love the sinner" I take it you've never actually been to church, you just had someone "tell you about it."  |
I think Rev. Wright was wrong in his intent and spirit. If I have ever said otherwise, let's see it. Moreover, why do you always fail to address the instant point and instead point to the bad acts of others in an attempt to obscure the bad act being talked about. This ad is cr*p. Do you not admit that? Then again, you think Rove is some sort of saviour, which is actually beneath you. Are you really for the Rovian smears and lies as opposed to the truth.
As for "fags," I am employing exaggeration for emphasis - but clearly it is the thought of many - a google of "dirty fags obama" or similar wording will prove that - much less the people who kill people just because they are gay, which I do not think any left wing person has done
Also, if you google "baby killer obama" or similar language -- you'll see enough of your ilk using it
I suppose you actually think R's never think in those terms, which I suggest is far from the truth.
As for other ministers - I suppose blaming 9/11 on "homosexuals" and abortionists is slightly better when it's sugar coated like that
You always suppose the oddest things about me. I have gone to Church since I was a baby. I was an acolyte and an alter boy until I was 16 or so, when you had to stop being one. I also taught Biblical studies for years and worked with Cahtolic charities (Covenant House) for a few years. Perhaps those events in my life give me some knowledge in the area
I just think that govt. and religion do not belong together. The Founding Fathers readily agree with me. Or, in this context, do you, like most R's lose that strict constructionist/Federalist argument?