View Single Post
  #3  
Old 08-04-2008, 07:36 PM
ajmccarrell ajmccarrell is offline
Registered
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Seattle
Posts: 845
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post
Once again and pay attention this time -- no one is talking about the recounts immediately after the election. They are talking about the state wide recount done much later. Please see the 100 other arguments about this for reference
Bub, YOU weren't paying attention. The other arguments were from left wing conspiracy sites. Why bother? I am talking about the same recount, bozo!
Here's another few articles for you to not read. This is a state recount after the election. It still shows Bush won, even if a hand recount had been conducted as Gore was asking.

http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpag...57C0A9679C8B63

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3a9a36841071.htm

http://www.nationalreview.com/commen...0312100915.asp

http://justoneminute.typepad.com/foo...rald_ap_1.html Here's one that argues the other side, but it's all, "I feel like there were more votes" with no proof.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...01/ai_n8933254
Reply With Quote