this bears repeating:
Quote:
|
Mark Fuhrman's use of racial slur had no bearing on anything other than to prejudice the jury as I said. If a jury could ignore all the other HARD evidence, and focus instead on the fact that a detective used racial slurs, then they werent concentrating on justice for two murdered people, but rather allowing themselves to be manipulated. No wonder attorneys think juries are stupid.
|
the blog highlights referred to just a fraction of the hard evidence, as well as the fact that Fuhrman was not the guilty party, OJ was. Pretty clever of the defense to put Fuhrman on trial eh? To cast doubt on HIS character or his actions as if he was somehow responsible??
AGAIN: that Jury was more than willing to be sit there and focus on something entirely OFF TOPIC so as not to have to face the sorry fact that one of "their own" had actually murdered two innocent people.