Quote:
Originally Posted by BTFLCHLD
the world as you know it may end  |
I'm genuine in urging this though. Originally, Lindsey didn't want to do Rumours II cuz that's what the record company wanted. . . some rehashed, false version of "Rumours." What I'm asking for is "Rumours II", the post-modern appraisal of the Mac myth. . . with its members rejoining to tell each other what they really think of each other, the love beneath the acrimony. The first catalogued 2-8 years of rumours. . . a new one has 30 years of experience from which to glean. I'm NOT dictating the style, the just the thematic unity, the shared intent, the return to call-and-response communication that makes the whole (band/albums) greater than the sum of their considerable parts. The title, Rumours II, would not only signify this thematic unity, it would also be a smart commercial move. And what's wrong with that... if the art is still there.