To return to the original idea...
The list is pretty good.
Of course i disagree a lot with it,but i have 95 of those and used to have 5 more.
Biggest disagreement i have with it, is including very recent(i think) releases.
Didn´t it say "have and will continue for years.."
It takes time for record to show it´s continuing importance,not just a year or two.
Also,
only one record per artist/band should be included as it should be efficent to cover that particular niche.
After all, only 200 records is very little, if it´s supposed to cover all of the popular music genre´s.
|