View Single Post
  #2  
Old 08-14-2007, 08:08 PM
irishgrl's Avatar
irishgrl irishgrl is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: in the past
Posts: 7,189
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind View Post
Your argument is illogical because OJ was never going to get the royalties. Under your scenario, if he did, he would pay tax on them and then the court would immediately seize them to pay off the civil judgement

I remember reading that he had set up a trust for his kids that would accept all rev. from the sale of the book. He would have no access to that money other than to request the trustee spend it for school and the like. I could be wrong though.

In any event, the court correctly ruled that this book was OJ's asset and OJ cannot distrute that asset without the permission of the court, which has a lien on all of his allowable assets.
do you have something that proves OJ wouldnt have gotten the royalties?

I dont think anyone begrudges his kids anything, they are innocent. However, I can think of no other reason for him to float this nasty godawful tripe unless he needed the $$$$.

Thank GAWD the Court has a lien on all his allowable assets.
Reply With Quote