Quote:
Originally Posted by Gailh
I've looked at the first few sections of the original Q&A from 1999 and he does seem mad at Mick, John and Chris mainly because they didn't insist that he be inducted in the Hall of Fame.
Personally I think he should have been. I'm not surprised that they didn't cause a stink about it. Who would want to stick up for someone who was suing them?
Gail
|
I can't believe that Bob was surprised when they didn't insist on him being inducted in the HOF too, since he had sued them. I think they were mad at Bob because they had to settle the lawsuit & give him some money(not that he wasn't right, I have no idea if he actually deserved more money or not).
By the way, the tone of his second Q & A is ALOT different than his first Q & A. It's almost like they were two different people.