Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind
That is because the D's played ball with W on Iraq up until just after the 2004 election. And, I bleive more than half of them still maintain the invasion was justified but W messed it up through incompetency. While W is incompetent, that number of D's makes impeachment impossible even if you ignore that Clinton killed under the same evidence and still supports that evidence and the fact that over 90% of the D's gave W the power to invade Iraq.
Maybe there is some other reason to impeach W, but for those reasons, he will never be impeached because of Iraq.
This is not saying I do not think he should go. I despise him.
|
but we now have more than one reason.
and Jason, we've already determined that Bush KNEW his evidence was faulty however Clinton did NOT. Bush used it anyway because it served his agenda. Clinton did not have an overpowering need to get Iraq's oil. Bush did. ergo, lie to the country and hide behind evidence that is OLD and discredited almost from the start (but that was conveniently overlooked eh?)
As for the "vote" you keep going back to, again, the Dems were ganged up on and anyone who didnt go along with the plan was labeled "traitor"