View Single Post
  #9  
Old 09-26-2006, 01:03 PM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SuzeQuze View Post
Clark still would have been at his post and they would have been paying attention.

Ds are not saying no spying (just no illegals spying) nor is there any proof that torture has lead to any foiled plots. It has, however, led to many false confessions. It is also leaves our soldiers vulnerable to torture out of revenge. I agree though that they should not run on these issues. I think the distinctions are too complex for most people to get. They don't pay close enough attention.
There was an article awhile back that said some of the confessions were valid. of course, we will never really know the truth, etc.

As for Clark being there - it still would have been a crap shoot as he was there for part of that eight months and the planning of 9/11 stretched out further than that and they did not catch them, etc. So, the facts indicate 9/11 likely could not have been prevented, though more effort by W would have helped This is what Clinton was saying.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote