Thread: undereating?
View Single Post
  #72  
Old 08-25-2006, 11:41 AM
bikerchic's Avatar
bikerchic bikerchic is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: in the best damn country in the world
Posts: 2,862
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carrie721 View Post
i'm sure there are some people in this world who have eaten chipmunk. i'm talking about on a large scale. also, if you could provide info on where they are eaten, i'd appreciate it, since a quick google search turned up nothing for me.

it's really odd to me to think that something may have evolved a certain way for the express purpose of mass-production, so i don't really know what to say to that. humans have two breasts, but our milk is not mass-produced. and if milk is so good for us to drink, then shouldn't we be drinking human milk our whole lives?

i think you contradict yourself - you say if we didn't hunt animals, we would be overrun by them, but then you say it's okay (and even, nature intended for us) to mass-produce them.
I'm just saying that anyone who believes that animals were not put on this earth to eat is absurd? It's just part of the food chain. Women have two breasts for when they do have more then one child to feed and its absolutely ridiculous to think that we could live off human milk all of our life. and when I say mass production, I mean milking more then one teat at a time, that's all.
__________________
~Theresa~

Reply With Quote