|
Originally Posted by amber
Okay, fair enough. All I saw is that you were implicitly accusing ledgies who thought the pics were funny of being insensitive, for reasons said ledgies had no obligations whatsoever to think about, and no reason to think about, save the reason that you thought their laughter was offensive, and tried to inspire guilt about it. As if your losses from nine eleven had anything whatsoever to do with our laughter about the Stevie pics. They did not, yet you implied they did. You implied our laughter was wrong and insensitive.
And that is where I get my f*ck you. Because we weren't thinking about losses, weren't laughing about tragedy, and yet you chose to assume umbrage about our reactions anyway, as if they were even remotely related to your existence, which they were not. And for you to use the phrase "almighty" in a sarcastic manner as if I were positing that, just shows some kind of complex you have about me simply stating my thoughts. You stated your thoughts, didn't you? I didn't call you "almighty" anything. I didn't imply that your opinions were "godlike" and irrefutable, or that you were trying to be superior in any way. I take people's opinions as just that, not as some ego challenge where I have to name winners and losers, and where people are trying to be all knowing, or whatever your implication was.
Argue with what I say, but don't let your insecurities pin some kind of personality trait on me that I don't even have, or reasons that don't motivate me. ("almighty", etc).
Just because I disagree with you doesn't mean I'm trying to dominate you, or be right at any cost, or that I have no respect for you. Kindly extend me the same courtesy of intention that I have extended you, one where the phrase "almighty" has never entered my mind, an existence where we are arguing the logic of ideas, without the ego involved, and without anyone bieng given extra points because they have more pain.
Thank you.
|