Quote:
|
Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Also and for the last time, please explain why Clinton, his wife, Kerry, and the majority of the D Party still stand behind this evidence not only as factual, but as a justification for W to do what he did, which brings me back to Hillary's 2004 quote in the original post of this thread in which she praised W for getting rid of SH. Why would she praise W for that if she thought he went into Iraq on a ruse. I mean if they all now know that the info. was bogus and that W was so horrible in the way he used it after he somehow found out it was false after the altruistic Clinton gave it to him, then why are the D's still defending its use and truth. Once again, you have no answer for that and instead allude to W somehow finding out it was patently false and then you have no comment on why the Clintons and the majority of the D party stand by its veracity. That you do not concede you are wrong here is astonishing but par for the course.
|
You are bringing up two different issues: 1) bogus info re: WMD as a justification for invading Iraq and 2) Hillary praising Bush for getting rid of Saddam. the bogus info was revealed as far back as 2002 but its been re-confirmed after every UN inspector has reported there were NO WMD.
As for Hillary praising bush for getting Saddam, that's her opinion and Ive seen no indication that she believed the veracity of the WMD info. YOU are the only person who seems to believe the Dems continue to believe it. Every article I've read indicates otherwise.
