Quote:
|
Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Then why is Clinton still behind Bush's reliance on that evidence. You talk a good game, but have yet to answer that question.
Also, Clinton and Bush I are fast friends now - isn't that just convenient.
BTW - those are polysyllabic words  |
That is easy too: BECAUSE IT
fit with Bush's agenda. Why cant you see that?
If I want to promote a bit of propaganda, (and I had no scruples) it wouldnt bother me at ALL to promote faulty info as real, especially if it came from a source that many people believed in the first place....You need a lesson in smoke and mirrors apparently..............