Quote:
|
Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Don't you all think that even if the D's had control of both houses, they could not impeach W as they cannot nail him on anything illegal except perhaps Iraq and as I always maintain, the D's are just as culpable in that fiasco so there is no way they will feed on their own (esp. Clintons and Kerry) just to get rid of W. Plus, impeachment is academic because the next few in line are hard ass R's  |
Jason, Im gonna say this as nicely as I can: why do you keep saying "the D's are just as culpable in that fiasco so there is no way they will feed on their own"
when the Democrats were trusting the P-freakin-resident to give them ACCURATE info on Iraq???? If they voted a certain way, it was because they went with the info they were given, which YOU KNOW AS WELL AS I DO, was manufactured to promote an agenda......The Bush Administration certainly took lessons from Old Mother Russia when it came to PROPAGANDA....therefore, I do NOT (REPEAT
NOT) hold the Dems culpable. The fault lies ENTIRELY with the BUSHIES. There is a MONUMENTAL difference between Clinton relying on info that was later proven faulty and Bush promoting the same info he darn well
KNEW was faulty. As far as I am concerned, let the feeding frenzy begin. Any Dems that voted FOR Iraq that knew better, they should go down too. But I betcha they didnt know, but rather were duped by the Bushie Propaganda Juggernaut.
