View Single Post
  #34  
Old 06-13-2005, 03:32 PM
strandinthewind's Avatar
strandinthewind strandinthewind is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: New York City
Posts: 25,791
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by irishgrl
Jason, I expect the Jury to decide based on evidence as well. Its just that I think there is PLENTY of evidence to point to guilt. You just chose not to believe it.

For myself, the word of the victim is a HUGE decider, plus his brother/sister, as well as the former employees, the videotaped police interview, the prior evidence, all point to a history a pattern and a current problem that MUST be stopped.

as usual, we are on opposite sides.....
the word of the victim is tainted - and his parents are known extorters I mean clearly that presents a shadow of a doubt on his word.

and - if there were such a pattern, then where are the other claims. We have seen two out of how many thousands that have been there

Any lawyer worth their salt will tell you the prosecution could not have done a worse job.

As for the employees, the key witness there was directly refuted by the the alleged abused and the accuser tried to extort Jackson.

I think you just hate MJ and do not care how or why they put him in jail.
__________________
Photobucket

save the cheerleader - save the world
Reply With Quote