Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lux
That method of thought is much closer to mine than most, although we still differ. I think that no theory can determine something is more likely than something else no matter how frequent its occurance in history. I think for our purposes it's useful to accept history as a source for accounting probability but that in a much grander sense, nothing is actually more probable than the next thing.
I think I'm already contradicting what I said elsewhere because I believe I said everything is determined by the series of events before it. Yep, I completely contradicted myself but if I stayed around a bit I'm sure I could talk myself in a circle and let my own theories exempt me from my own theories. Of course then I still wouldn't have eaten nor done the dishes.
|
Ah HA!

(at what, i'm not sure...). oh, the past determining the future thing. yeah. that's it.
speaking of dishes....

lux, can you come do mine?
