View Single Post
  #18  
Old 11-12-2004, 10:40 AM
SuzeQuze's Avatar
SuzeQuze SuzeQuze is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: By the sea.
Posts: 10,583
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I know - people think that means you have to be 100% sure and that most def. not is the standard. If it were, there would be few convictions and many less plea bargains because people would want to go to court and let the prosec. face that HUGE burden

And - it is so frustrating when everyone knows someone did it, but the prosec. ignorantly brings the wrong charges and/or files the case prematurely, like I think they did in this case.
It would seem that perhaps the heinousness of the crime, and the prosecutor's conviction that Peterson committed the crime, may have clouded his/her vision on carrying out proper procedure. I actually did check out a lot of the information on this case on courttv.com but it was a while back. That site is cool because all of the facts are there. After reading it I felt like any jury would have to convict. But, I was not in that courtroom. Please God, let them convict!
Reply With Quote