Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dissention
I think he did it, but the circumstancial evidence is pretty weak, especially in a death penalty case.
|
Not really, too many circumstances that put him with enough of a motive, and enough time to have killed her. For example: The whole umbrella thing is wierd. The whole reason he said he went to the warehouse was to put away the umbrellas. He said he forgot...How could he forget if he was able to put away the boat tarp WHICH WAS STORED UNDER THE UMBRELLAS. Then add the cement. Then add him fishing in the same spot she washed ashore, with expert testimoney saying the decay time matched her being in the water for as long as she was. Then add him being found at the Mexican border (something the Defense barely even touched upon cause they knew they couldn't explain it). All these circumstances point the finger DIRECTLY at Scott. And lets not mention the phone call between Scott and his mother in law where hes listening to a message from her saying they were investigating a lead in the case, and he
laughs !!!!!!!!!
~Alex