[GateandGarden]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

I know W said that - but my point is and was that is not the same as saying "I support civil unions and would be fine with them, so let's get the states on board with that" - instead, W and his crewe then went to the states and made sure the anti civil union lang. was in there. AND - W called for a Fed. Const. Amendment and the people that were drafting that bill also included anti-civil union lang., which W clearly knew. So, his words seven days before the election are meaningless. He KNEW the anti civil union lang. was in those amendments I am at a loss to see how anyone can argue against that. But, my word is not law

Exactly! It was nothing but talk. I'm with you--I don't see how someone can argue against that.

Hillary