Edwards did succeed in saying that the Repugs were using this issue as a wedge issue with voters and that the whole idea of using a constitutional amendment is a red herring and explained that no state in the union has to recognize any other state's marriage (although they certainly will if it was a hetrosexual marriage). Yes, I wish the Democrats would have the balls to just flat out say, "If this is what two people wish to do, fine with me." I have never understood the argument that two gays getting married was somehow going to threaten a hetrosexual marriage and the "family". Then again, I don't understand why anyone would want to get married, straight or gay!
|