Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Johnny Stew
Some say it was scrapped because she felt she looked fat. Others say it was scrapped because the record company plain didn't like it, and wanted a dance-oriented video for a dance-oriented song.
So who can say?
Either way, scrapping a video that cost a few thousand dollars is a little different than demanding extensive digital re-touching, which would cost millions.  |
I hardly think that the Civil War version of Stand Back cost "a few thousand dollars." Who knows why it was scrapped and I could care less because I didn't like it anyways, the point Amber was trying to make (if I read her correctly) was that she had no qualms about reshooting an entire music video, so she probably would have no qualms about requesting digital re-touching.
No one has said that "extensive digital re-touching" occurred, just that some was. And it does NOT cost millions to do most re-touching. It did in the dark ages of cinema computer technology, not so today.