Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dissention
I posted that you said Moore's appraoch lent him less credibility. Your response?
"Well, it does."
What am I not getting? You're faulting him for his approach, plain and simple. Why won't you admit it? And since when can a one-sided argument supported by facts be considered not factual?
|
I guess I do not see that as a fault since it was his objective. But, yes, I think it makes anything less credible when the presenter uses one sided approaches when presenting the facts. Again, he admits he wanted to do that. That was his objective. I do not fault him for it. If I did, I recant.