Quote:
|
Originally Posted by strandinthewind
Bless your heart, I am saying MM's film wsa good and he was very effective in it. If I am faulting him for anything it is the film is too one sided to be touted as factual in general. But, that was his goal and he reached it by employing the same histrionics most employ. Thus, no fault can be attached. He meant to use these tactics. So, he and the film are without falut. Were I do find fault is with people that procliam the movie is the only version of events and facts. That is wrong. The movie is a one sided version.
better!
|
I posted that you said Moore's appraoch lent him less credibility. Your response?
"Well, it does."
What am I not getting? You're faulting him for his approach, plain and simple. Why won't you admit it? And since when can a one-sided argument supported by facts be considered not factual?