Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dissention
You've totally lost me AND your arguments.
You went from faulting him for his gimmick, to saying you're not faulting him for his gimmick, back to faulting him for his gimmick.
I'm done with this line of debate, you aren't making sense.
As for people touting it as fair and balanced, put down the crackpipe.  No one has ever said that. The most we've said is that it's factual, which it is. |
Bless your heart, I am saying MM's film wsa good and he was very effective in it. If I am faulting him for anything it is the film is too one sided to be touted as factual in general. But, that was his goal and he reached it by employing the same histrionics most employ. Thus, no fault can be attached. He meant to use these tactics. So, he and the film are without falut. Were I do find fault is with people that procliam the movie is the only version of events and facts. That is wrong. The movie is a one sided version.
better!