Quote:
|
Originally Posted by dissention
No, I have no problem with it. I would if the story was all lies, but Moore uses his histrionics to sell true and factually based stories; that's the difference between he and Randi and that ass Hannity. Understand?  |
Well, I agree on the diff, you make. I comment only on the technique!!!!!!!
BTW - La Rhodes (sp.?) is not above lying. Look at the Ollie North interview. When Ollie North, who I am no fan of by any means, said he was never convicted of a crime, RR went apoplectic. Ollie North was telling the truth - there is no way around that. He tried to explain to RR that when a conviction is overturned it is as if is never existed. Instead of seeing the truth of that, RR launched into an atteck mode. That sounds like Hannity to me
