[gldstwmn]

Originally Posted by strandinthewind

Well, there is a difference. This guy chose to travel through seceral countries to Iraq, a country that reportedly hated OBL and his ilk and he finds a safe haven where he gets medical attention and then is let go. They defies belief in coincidence IMO.

It's not enough to justify war.

On the other hand, I think it would be next to impossible for the Bush family to have kept that large under wraps for all that time (almost 15 or so years) and there are just too many people involved IMO for everyone to keep quiet. But, I am not saying W and the Bush family are not in bed with the Saudi's. They are. I am just saying I do not think the facts 100% support that theory and the facts can be read in the opposite light. But, you are certainly entitled to think that I just cannot believe the Pres. of the US would allow OBL and SA to coordinate an attack on the US and do nothing about it. All for oil, which the Saudi's already have That is just too much for me to believe. Now, do I think W could have done more to stop 9/11, yes I do. But I also think Clinton could have as well and certainly he was not part of W's plot? In the end, I think OBL operates on his own but has little disturbance from the Saudi govt. Anyway, that is what I think

Well, a couple of things. Complicity could be as simple as him not reading the August 6, PDB, which I don't think he did. I haven't figured out the level of complicity yet.
When I asked who has the most to gain, you seem to think Saudi Arabia has the most to gain but they already have all the oil, so you answered your own question there. They didn't have the most to gain. Bushco did.
Also, why is Bushco seemingly uninterested in finding Bin Laden? He's stated that he "doesn't care" where Bin Laden is. What the hell is that about?