View Single Post
  #40  
Old 06-16-2004, 01:26 PM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by strandinthewind
I know that. Again, I am not talking about the way he portrayed the dead people, etc., It was his sarcasm, etc., in other parts of the film. I mean and please correct me if I am wrong, but there was nothing humorous or sarcastic about this event. Yet, his film has that tone. That is all I am saying.
Which is why he didn't portray the event or anything to do with it in a sarcastic or humorous light. I don't see why you don't understand that. Surely you don't believe that the film was soley about Columbine. It was about this country's obssession with guns and violence. Now, if you can't see the humor in banks giving away a gun with a new account, you don't have a pulse. But he did not have that tone when dealing with the Columbine incident in the documentary. Surely his passion and emotions about what happened there came through in the documentary. They did to me.
__________________

Reply With Quote