Quote:
|
Originally Posted by madformac
I was told personally by a very senior source well before the latest US invasion of Iraq that no new chemical weapons would be found. He knew exactly what chemicals the UN weapons teams had logged and impounded and was 100% sure nothing else would turn up. Which tells me if the UN chemical weapons teams knew everything then Bush and his "advisors" knew all the facts too. That's enough evidence for me of his intentions. The whole situation stinks.
|
I agree there is something going on here that does not meet the eye. But, why would the vast majority of the D's in Congress, Pres. Clinton, the UN, and the the intelligence agency's of every major country in the word be on board. It just seems that if they, esp. Kerry who knew he was running then, knew the whole thing was bogus, they could have excoriatred W and made a clear, wide, and unobstructed path for a D to take the WH in 04 and, perhaps, W's resignation under threat of impeachment. The whole thing is just odd to me and I cannot find a rationale thought to explain it other than all of them (R or D) are just liars and all perpetuated the WMD idea to scare people. Very strange indeed.
I am not excusing W, I am just saying that if it was that apparent no WMD existed at all, someone would be using that info. now for political gain. So, I conclude they were there or at least they thought they were there although clearly not in the exigent mode W lied about.