View Single Post
  #4  
Old 03-09-2004, 10:10 AM
dissention's Avatar
dissention dissention is offline
Addicted Ledgie
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 26,612
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by strandinthewind
I know - I think she and the ret of the band wanted a double album in the beginning, but as LB said, the cost of putting out 30 or more songs was poo pooed by the power to be. Then LB had the sand to say "I'll eat the cost" (Kudos to him). But, the powers to be made the cost so much in both money and time, that he had to back down. And - double records do not sell as well because of the price - so maybe LB was offering t lower his pershare sales and, perhaps, concert proceeds. I cannot wait until Sunday.
I think the last Outkast album shoots down that reasoning. It was a double and cost the exact same as a single disc album. As was Shania Twain's last album. I suspect that the double album could've been released, cost the same, and sold just as well, but that the label poo-pooed the idea because they didn't believe a double album from a veteran act would've done well. And they're wrong; it would've sold the same.
__________________

Reply With Quote