Quote:
Originally posted by misterbug
I'm not screaming about not knowing the evidence, I'm writing that you all should look at the available evidence and facts before just lashing out. Surely you don't think statements like "Jacko is a pig" and "MJ is just plain chalk [sic] full of NUTS!!!!" are well-thought out??
I don't understand this question. Touch his lips how? And why?? What does it mean? Plus, I did not even attend the get-together at Neverland. I'm in Boston not the West Coast, and I did not receive an invitation.
|
Would you attend if you got one? Probably.
I've looked at the facts and they all support the boy, not Jacko. Do you honestly think that they would go to all this trouble over a he-said he-said kind of thing? That's rather ludicrous and delusional.
Unfortunately, I think your ardent support of this cold man clouds your objectivity. I, on the other hand, have looked at it objectively and believe the boy. I really had no opinion of the first case and was never a fan of Jackson's one way or the other, but when it came out that the descriptions the boy gave of Jacko's genitals matched up with him physically, I started to really question things. Then we find out about bedroom alarms (say it was to be safe from intruders all you want, it was like trying to get into Fort Knox), a secret room of unmarked videotapes, saying he sleeps with young boys, corroboration by lawyers of the child, death threats to the man who introduced the boy to Jacko, leaked documents that prove harrassment and stalking on the part of Jacko's camp towards the boy and his family (which Geragos knew about, yet never mentioned it), and Jacko's behavior over all of this; it really makes a person wonder about guilt.
With all that info and the endless amount of other info out there, how can you say that he is absolutely innocent? His freakish look and sleep tanks and monkeys and Elephant Man bones have nothing to do with this; it's his behavior towards children and his attitude about all of this. He's guilty as sin.