Quote:
Originally posted by CarneVaca
I never said "big lie." You don't seem to know the difference between "big lie" and "tall tale," but that's your problem.
|
As I'm sure you should be well aware, a "tall tale" is something improbable or unlikely to be true... and when we purposely say something "untrue," it amounts to telling a "lie."
So no, you may not have actually used the word "lie," but it's just a matter of semantics, when you stated that you believe Stevie was telling a story that wasn't true.
IE:, a
lie.
But hey, I'm just a dumb Stevie fan, who apparently doesn't have a grasp on the English language, so what do I know?
Quote:
Originally posted by CarneVaca
You provided the evidence yourself. The fact you have alternate takes of the song proves that she did not "wipe" the vocals. That's all I've contented all along -- that it didn't happen.
|
I have multiple mixes of
many songs where a certain harmony or backing vocal was mixed out, or... conversely... made more prominent. "Oh Daddy" being a good example of that... where Stevie's backing vocal is nowhere to be found on the album version, but is clearly noticeable on the DVD-Audio mix. Same exact take, different mix.
So I'm still not sure why you consider that alternate mix of "When I See You Again" to be proof that your theory has to be the only one that's right.
Quote:
Originally posted by CarneVaca
Here we go with the generalizations. You and your buddies are exchanging private messages again. That's fine. But just keep them private; I could give a **** less about your exchanges with them.
|
Nancy (sodascouts) posted right here on this thread, saying your comments to me were "uncalled for" (Sorry to bring you into this, Nancy - I hope you don't mind), and that's what I was referring to.
Anything else you read into it is completely on you and your ego, buddy.
At any rate, this whole thing has become absolutely ridiculous.
